š Guideline basis
EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardise deformation imaging; ASE/EACVI recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography; Porter TR, et al. 2018 ASE guidelines update on ultrasound enhancing agents (JASE 2018;31:241ā74); Narang A, et al. on artificial intelligence in echocardiography (JASE 2023, PMID 37059617); ASE 2025 diastolic and right heart guidelines for strain thresholds.
Speckle-tracking strain
Physics
Ultrasound speckle ā the interference pattern generated by sub-resolution scatterers within myocardium ā is stable enough between consecutive frames to be tracked. Displacement of speckle kernels over the cardiac cycle yields deformation.
ε (Lagrangian) = ((L - Lā) / Lā) Ć 100%Longitudinal strain is negative because the myocardium shortens; more negative is better. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) averages segmental peak systolic longitudinal strain across the three apical views.
Acquisition requirements
Requirement | Specification | Consequence of failure |
Frame rate | 40ā80 frames/s | Too low, speckle decorrelates; too high, insufficient line density |
Views | All three apical views, unforeshortened, matched heart rates | Foreshortening inflates strain magnitude |
Region of interest | ~90% of myocardial thickness; exclude pericardium | Pericardial inclusion corrupts tracking |
ECG | Good quality with clear R waves; end-systole defined by aortic valve closure | Mistimed gating shifts peak strain |
Cycles | 3ā5 per view | Beat-to-beat variability, particularly in AF |
Normal values and the vendor problem
Normal GLS is approximately ā20% or more negative. RV free wall strain and RV global strain are normal when more negative than approximately ā20% to ā25%, with the ASE 2025 right heart guideline grading dysfunction from those values (Chapter 9). LA reservoir strain ⤠18% indicates elevated LA pressure in the ASE 2025 diastolic algorithm (Chapter 8).
Strain values are vendor-dependent. Absolute values differ between analysis packages by amounts comparable to the difference between normal and mildly abnormal. The ASE 2025 diastolic guideline reports LA strain normal ranges separately by vendor for this reason. Two practical rules follow:
- Never compare a strain value obtained on one vendor's package with a threshold derived on another.
- For serial monitoring, use the same machine and the same software version, and say so in the report.
Strain in critical illness
Use | Value | Limitation |
Detecting early septic myocardial involvement | Abnormal GLS with a normal EF is common in sepsis (Chapter 29) | Prognostic significance contested |
RV free wall strain | Detects RV dysfunction before TAPSE falls; unaffected by pericardiotomy in the way TAPSE is (Chapter 36) | Image quality dependent |
LA reservoir strain | A filling-pressure surrogate in the 2025 ASE algorithm | Not valid in AF, significant MR, transplant recipients, or normal-EF patients with GLS > 18% |
Cardiac amyloidosis | Apical sparing polar plot pattern (Chapter 40) | Requires adequate images in all three apical views |
Cardiotoxicity surveillance | A ā„ 15% relative fall in GLS defines subclinical dysfunction | Not an acute ICU application |
ā ļø Load dependence
GLS is load-dependent in the same direction as ejection fraction: it improves with vasodilatation and worsens with vasoconstriction. Serial GLS across a large change in noradrenaline dose is not comparing like with like, and this is not addressed by any current guideline.
Three-dimensional echocardiography
Application | Advantage | ICU feasibility |
LV volumes and EF | No geometric assumption; closer agreement with CMR than 2D biplane | Requires adequate images and breath-hold-quality gating; multibeat acquisition is corrupted by arrhythmia and ventilation |
RV volumes and RVEF | The only echocardiographic method giving true RV volumes; ASE 2025 grades 3D RVEF (normal > 45%) | Feasible with dedicated software and good images |
3D LVOT planimetry | Corrects the elliptical-LVOT error that causes 2D methods to underestimate stroke volume by ~10ā20% (Chapter 11) | Under-used; the highest-yield 3D application in haemodynamics |
3D vena contracta area | Direct planimetry of a non-circular regurgitant orifice; avoids PISA's hemispheric and circular assumptions (Chapter 17) | Multibeat acquisition often needed for line density |
En face valve views | Mitral prosthesis assessment and paravalvular leak localisation ā the ASE 2024 reference method (Chapter 23) | TEE; excellent |
Interventional guidance | TEER, valve-in-valve, paravalvular leak closure | Procedural |
Practical constraints in the ICU: multibeat "stitched" acquisitions produce stitch artefacts with arrhythmia or ventilation-induced translation. Single-beat acquisitions avoid this at the cost of volume rate. Target volume rates above 20 Hz for structural assessment, and prefer single-beat acquisition when measurements will be taken.
Ultrasound enhancing agents
Covered operationally in Chapter 3. The essentials:
- Indication: ā„ 2 contiguous non-diagnostic LV segments; suspected LV thrombus; apical variant HCM; apical aneurysm; incomplete TR envelope for PASP estimation (agitated saline for the latter).
- Technique: low mechanical index (0.1ā0.3). High MI destroys microbubbles.
- Artefacts: swirling apical defect from excessive MI mimicking thrombus; basal attenuation from excessive concentration.
- Under-use is the problem, not over-use. Contrast frequently converts a non-diagnostic ICU study into a diagnostic one and avoids escalation to TEE.
Artificial intelligence
What exists
Capability | Maturity |
Automated view classification | Mature; reliable on standard-quality images |
Chamber segmentation and automated EF | Mature; commercially deployed; agreement with expert readers is good on good images |
Automated GLS | Available; still requires contour verification |
Automated diastolic function grading | Rule-based implementations of the 2016 algorithm exist; ASE 2025 notes these inherit the 2016 framework's indeterminate-case problem |
Guidance for novice acquisition | Deployed; prompts probe movement toward a standard view |
Outcome-trained continuous scoring | Research; a continuous diastolic function score has been developed that classifies cases the guideline algorithms would call indeterminate |
Why ICU images are the hard case
Every failure mode of these systems is concentrated in exactly the population this book addresses.
- Training-data distribution. Models are overwhelmingly trained on ambulatory laboratory studies: sinus rhythm, good windows, standard views, resting loading. ICU images are off-axis, foreshortened, low-frame-rate, arrhythmic and acquired through hyperinflated lungs. Performance degrades, and the degradation is not always signalled by a confidence score.
- Silent failure. A segmentation model given a foreshortened apical view returns a plausible EF. It does not report that the view was foreshortened. The error is invisible in the output.
- Physiological blindness. An automated EF of 65% in vasoplegic septic shock is numerically correct and clinically misleading (Chapter 29). No current system reasons about loading conditions.
- Guideline inheritance. Automated diastolic grading built on the 2016 algorithm reproduces its indeterminate rate and its exclusion violations ā it will happily grade a patient in atrial fibrillation.
The governance rule
Every automated measurement used in a clinical decision must be verified by the operator against the image from which it was derived. In practice: check the contour, check the view is not foreshortened, check the timing, and check the number against the visual impression. Where they disagree, the image wins.
Report automated measurements as such, and state the software used. This is a reproducibility requirement, and it also makes downstream audit possible.
ā ļø Evidence quality
No AI echocardiography system has been shown in a randomised trial to improve patient outcomes in critical care. The evidence base is diagnostic-accuracy studies, largely in non-ICU populations. Regulatory clearance establishes acceptable performance against a reference standard in a defined population; it does not establish benefit in yours.
Where AI plausibly helps in the ICU
- Reducing measurement variability for serial monitoring, where consistency matters more than absolute accuracy ā automated VTI tracing on the same patient across a fluid challenge is a good fit.
- Guidance for less experienced operators acquiring standard views out of hours.
- Quality assurance triage, flagging studies for expert over-read (Chapter 42).
ICU-specific limitations ā summary
Modality | Principal ICU constraint |
Strain | Image quality; frame rate; vendor dependence; load dependence |
3D | Stitch artefact with arrhythmia and ventilation; volume rate; image quality |
Contrast | Requires low-MI capability and operator familiarity; under-used |
AI | Training-data mismatch; silent failure on non-standard images; no outcome evidence |
š Critical pitfall: Comparing serial strain values acquired on different machines or software versions. The vendor difference can exceed the physiological change being sought.
š Critical pitfall: Accepting an automated ejection fraction without inspecting the contour and confirming the apical view is not foreshortened. Foreshortening inflates EF by 5ā10 points and the algorithm will not tell you.
š Critical pitfall: Reporting a 3D volume from a stitched multibeat acquisition in a patient with atrial fibrillation. The stitch artefact invalidates the measurement.
- š” Clinical pearl: 3D LVOT planimetry is the most under-used advanced technique in critical care haemodynamics. It removes the squared-diameter error that dominates every stroke volume calculation in this book.
- š” Clinical pearl: RV free wall strain detects dysfunction before TAPSE falls and is not abolished by pericardiotomy ā making it the RV measure of choice after cardiac surgery.
- š” Clinical pearl: Treat AI output as a second opinion from a colleague who cannot see the patient. Useful, worth checking, never final.
References
- Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:1ā11.
- Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012;25:3ā46.
- Porter TR, Mulvagh SL, Abdelmoneim SS, et al. Clinical applications of ultrasonic enhancing agents in echocardiography: 2018 ASE guidelines update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2018;31:241ā74.
- Narang A, et al. Artificial intelligence in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2023. PMID 37059617.
- Nagueh SF, Sanborn DY, Oh JK, et al. ASE 2025 diastolic function update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2025;38:537ā69.
- American Society of Echocardiography. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2025.