30, 23, 88
A standardised instrument set exists, so a programme recording functional outcome at discharge does not need to invent one. Its absence is a named limitation in the ECPR registry literature. Recorded here as a retrieval target rather than as usable content.
Candidate tools identified from a systematic review of the literature and clinical trial registrations
Hodgson CL, Fulcher B, Mariajoseph FP, Burrell AJC, Pellegrino V, Brodie D, Fan E. Crit Care Med 2021;49(12):e1252-e1254. DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005110
Two-round international web-based modified Delphi to select measurement tools and timing of measurement for the previously published core outcome set
Abstract only; the substantive content — which instruments, measured when — was not retrievable. Consensus rather than outcome evidence.
Response rates 46 of 65 (71 percent) and 40 of 46 (87 percent). Seven measurement tools were identified for the core outcome set of patients on ECMO. [VERIFICATION REQUIRED: the seven tools and their measurement timings are NOT named in the abstract and are not reproduced in this book.]
Participants identified from the International ECMO Network and ELSO, including consumers, multidisciplinary clinicians, researchers and industry partners, from 15 countries across five continents